Introduction

Florida’s children are at the center of an urgent and growing crisis — not one of mental illness, but one of systemic psychiatric overreach, parental rights violations, dangerous drug prescriptions, and the misuse of state law. The Citizens Commission on Human Rights of Florida (CCHR Florida), a nonprofit mental health watchdog organization, has documented hundreds of cases and published extensively on these issues. This article consolidates the key findings and concerns raised across those publications into one comprehensive overview, with the goal of informing parents, advocates, and legislators about what is at stake.

1. The Baker Act: A Law Designed to Protect, Now Used to Harm

What Is the Baker Act?

Florida’s Mental Health Act, commonly known as the Baker Act, allows for the involuntary commitment of individuals deemed to be a danger to themselves or others. Law enforcement officers, medical professionals, and even school resource officers can initiate a Baker Act hold. While originally designed as an emergency intervention, the law has become widely misused; particularly against children.^[1]

Alarming Numbers

The statistics tell a troubling story:

At its peak in 2020/2021, nearly 40,000 children were Baker Acted in a single year in Florida.^[2]
Over 37,000 involuntary psychiatric examinations were initiated on children during 2018/2019 alone.^[3]
The Suncoast Region — including Hillsborough, Manatee, Pinellas, Pasco, DeSoto, and Sarasota counties saw the highest occurrence rates.^[2]
An 85-page study found that the Baker Act is increasingly being used on school children who make jokes, act out, exhibit normal manifestations of a known disability, or express ordinary sadness.^[4]

How the Baker Act Is Being Abused

Despite its stated purpose, the Baker Act has become a tool for psychiatric facilities to detain children under questionable circumstances — often without proper justification or parental consent. Among the documented abuses:

Children are taken directly from schools without parents being informed until after the fact.^[1]
Parents often have no immediate legal recourse to stop an involuntary psychiatric hold.^[1]
Children can be held for days and drugged against their parents’ wishes through Emergency Treatment Orders (ETOs), which can be issued if a child acts up, shouts, or misbehaves.^[1]
A 6-year-old girl in Jacksonville was Baker Acted from her elementary school for throwing a tantrum, placed in a patrol car and taken to a mental health facility without her mother’s consent.^[1]
A 14-year-old boy was Baker Acted after telling a school counselor he was stressed about homework. He was subsequently heavily medicated without parental approval.^[1]

The Financial Incentive

Psychiatric hospitals profit from involuntary commitments. While the state-contracted rate for Crisis Stabilization Units is approximately $300 per day per bed, private psychiatric facilities can bill significantly more, with some billing insurers upward of $1,200–$1,400 per day, making the Baker Acting of children potentially big business in Florida. Each new patient generates insurance billing, Medicaid claims, and revenue for the facility. CCHR Florida President Diane Stein has stated directly: “The Baker Act is profitable and it is being used as a disciplinary tool.”^[2]

2. Parental Rights: The Foundation Being Eroded

A Constitutional Right Under Threat

Parents have the fundamental constitutional right to direct the upbringing, education, and mental health care of their children. Florida recognized this right formally with the passage of the Parents’ Bill of Rights in 2021. Yet, CCHR Florida argues that this right is being systematically undermined by Florida’s mental health law.^[2]

The U.S. Supreme Court Weighs In

In a significant March 2026 ruling — Mirabelli v. Bonta — the U.S. Supreme Court granted an emergency application blocking California’s school gender-secrecy policies, delivering a major signal in favor of parental rights. The Court held that public-school policies concealing a child’s social gender transition from parents likely violate parents’ substantive due process rights under the 14th Amendment and their free exercise rights. The Court emphasized that parents, not the state, are the primary protectors of a child’s safety and well-being, and they have the right not to be “shut out” of decisions about their children’s mental health and identity.

It is important to note that Mirabelli v. Bonta was decided as an emergency/shadow docket ruling, meaning it does not establish formally binding precedent in the same way a full merits decision would. However, it provides strong persuasive authority that advocates, parents, and legislators across all 50 states can cite when challenging policies that exclude parents from consequential decisions about their children’s mental health and identity. The Court’s reasoning — grounded in longstanding parental-rights doctrine — signals clearly how the Court views the constitutional primacy of parental involvement in children’s upbringing and schooling nationwide.^[5]

Legislative Progress in Florida

Florida has taken important legislative steps to strengthen parental rights:

2021: Legislation was passed affirming a parent’s right to direct the mental health of their children and requiring parental notification before a child is Baker Acted.
2022: Changes were made concerning parental rights in education, including prohibiting the use of mental health industry-based Social Emotional Learning (SEL) programs in schools.

Notably, since these changes were enacted, the youth suicide rate in Florida has begun to decline and the rate of children being Baker Acted has also started falling — dropping by nearly 10,000 cases per year. CCHR Florida attributes this positive trend directly to the empowerment of parents.^[6]

3. Mental Health Screening in Schools: Who Really Benefits?

The Push to Screen Children

During campaigns like Children’s Mental Health Week, industry attention and advertising is heavily focused on children, promoting the idea that mental health screening is essential. So-called experts claim that approximately 20 percent of children suffer from some form of mental illness, yet these same experts continue to promote the scientifically discredited chemical imbalance theory.^[7]

CCHR Florida argues that psychiatric screenings are designed to cast a wide net to capture as many children as possible. Youth experiencing the normal tribulations of childhood are often erroneously identified as having a mental disorder. Once labeled, they are subjected to whatever solutions psychiatric authorities recommend, including powerful psychiatric drugs.^[7]

Questions of Efficacy

An article titled “9 Serious Concerns about Depression Screening for Youth” raises serious questions about whether screenings actually lead to better outcomes for children. Without evidence of improved results, the question becomes: who actually benefits? According to CCHR Florida, the answer is pharmaceutical companies and the field of mental health.^[7]

Trends of increased screenings leading to drug prescriptions are especially alarming because so little is known about the long- or short-term effects of psychiatric drugs on a child’s developing brain, whether taken alone or in combination. These drugs are frequently prescribed “off-label” with unproven efficacy and safety.^[7]

Schools and the Mental Health Power Struggle

CCHR Florida poses a foundational question that legislators and administrators have largely failed to answer: Why are schools involved in children’s mental health in the first place?^[8]

With schools increasingly sidestepping parents in matters of mental health treatment and curriculum, a power struggle has emerged between schools and families. Among the concerns documented:

Schools are covertly enrolling children in mental health programs without adequate parental notification.
Apps to track children’s feelings are raising privacy concerns.
Some academic facilities operate school-based mental health centers that may expose children to interventions parents have not approved.
A Scientific American article by two psychiatrists reported that 40 years of suicide risk research shows the mental health industry is “not very good” at predicting suicide risk and that the screening process itself may increase the likelihood of suicide.^[6]

4. The Over-Diagnosis and Over-Medication of Children

ADHD: A Diagnostic Epidemic

ADHD is the most commonly diagnosed mental disorder in the United States. According to a 2022 CDC study, an estimated 7 million U.S. children aged 3–17 have been diagnosed with ADHD. CCHR Florida argues this staggering number demands scrutiny.^[9]

Dr. Suzanne O’Sullivan, a consultant neurologist with over 35 years of experience, warns that we live in an “age of over diagnosis” — one that unnecessarily medicalizes normal human behaviors. Dr. Lawrence Diller, a behavioral developmental therapist, states: “There is no blood test that definitively says who has ADHD and who doesn’t. The decision where to draw the line between abnormal and normal variance of behavior is an arbitrary one.”^[9]

If an ADHD diagnosis is subjective, why are 7 million children diagnosed with it? CCHR Florida’s answer: money.^[9]

Pharmaceutical Industry Influence

The pharmaceutical industry’s role in driving ADHD diagnoses is documented and substantial:

In 2021 alone, Teva Pharmaceuticals generated over half a billion dollars in revenue from Adderall.^[9]
A study in Psychiatric Services found that 42,716 psychiatrists received $358 million in payments from pharmaceutical companies between 2015 and 2021.^[9]
Pharmaceutical companies have invested millions to open new mental health clinics dedicated to ADHD diagnosis and treatment; one company alone spent $4 million to open such centers.^[9]

The Danger of ADHD Medications

The Physicians Desk Reference lists methamphetamine as a treatment for ADHD. Ritalin, far more commonly prescribed, is chemically similar to methamphetamine, one of the most dangerous street drugs in the world. The only reason Ritalin is more prevalent is its lower cost.

Furthermore, there remains no understanding of how these drugs actually work in the brain, particularly regarding ADHD. As Dr. Diller notes: “If you’re just curious what Ritalin does to the brain… nobody knows. There isn’t a single unifying concept for ADHD.”

As of 2022, approximately 6.5 million U.S. children have been diagnosed ADHD, with roughly half (53.6%) receiving ADHD medication; meaning an estimated 3.5 million children are currently taking these drugs. When all categories of psychiatric drugs prescribed to children are included, the total number of children on psychiatric medications in the United States exceeds 8.5 million.^[3]

5. Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) on Children: An Ongoing Outrage

The Continued Use of Electroshock on Minors

Despite widespread concern from medical professionals and international human rights organizations, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), commonly known as electroshock, is still being used on children. CCHR Florida has called for an outright ban.^[10]

The World Health Organization and the United Nations have both concluded that ECT “is not recommended for children, and this should be prohibited through legislation.” The FDA has received thousands of adverse-reaction reports regarding ECT yet the mental health industry continues its use.^[10]

In 2003, Dr. Loren Mosher and Professor David Cohen raised the foundational ethical question: if the first rule of medicine is to do no harm, what justification is there for promoting an ineffective procedure, particularly one administered without the informed consent of young patients?^[10]

CCHR Florida actively supports legislation in Florida to protect children from ECT and continues to call for a complete ban on both ECT and psychosurgery for people of any age.

6. Youth Suicide: The Failure of Psychiatric Solutions

A Worsening Crisis — Until Parents Were Empowered

Since 1997, Florida law has allowed children as young as 13 to seek outpatient mental health treatment without parental knowledge or consent, done under the false hope that autonomous access to psychiatric care would reduce youth suicide. It did not.^[6]

In 2007, Florida established the Statewide Office for Suicide Prevention (SOSP) and the Florida Suicide Prevention Coordinating Council (SPCC). Youth suicide rates continued to climb.^[6]

The pattern is clear: psychiatric interventions (screenings, expanded funding, Baker Acting children) have not reduced youth suicide. What has made a difference, according to data tracked by CCHR Florida, is the restoration of parental rights. Since Florida passed parental rights legislation in 2021 and 2022, youth suicide rates have finally begun to decline.^[6]

Self-Harm: The Psychiatric Trap

CCHR Florida has also raised alarm about the pattern by which children experiencing self-harm are treated. The natural progression laid out by the psychiatric community often leads to a prescription of psychotropic drugs with no resolution of the original problem. The drugs prescribed may carry serious and poorly understood risks, particularly for developing brains.^[4]

7. Foster Care and the Baker Act

Children in the foster care system are particularly vulnerable. CCHR Florida has documented the intersection of foster care and the Baker Act, noting that children already experiencing the trauma of family separation are being subjected to additional trauma through involuntary psychiatric holds. CCHR Florida has called for a Foster Child Bill of Rights; legislation that would provide more rights to both children in foster care and their caregivers, including parents with whom children are placed.^[4]

8. Legislative Victories and the Road Ahead

CCHR Florida has achieved significant legislative successes in its campaign to protect children, earning the 2022 Social Impact Award and the 2022 Platinum Award for Government Relations, as well as the 2024 Bulldog PR Award GOLD for its protection of children campaign.^[3]^[4]

Key legislative milestones include:

2021 School Safety Bill: Required parental/guardian notification prior to the initiation of a Baker Act on a minor child.
Parents’ Bill of Rights (2021): Enshrined a parent’s right to direct the mental health of their children.
2022 Parental Rights in Education: Prohibited the use of industry-based Social Emotional Learning in Florida schools.

Despite these gains, CCHR Florida President Diane Stein stresses that more work remains: “It is time for Florida to finish the job they started and pass legislation that will cement a parent’s right to direct the mental health of their children and abolish the use of the involuntary Baker Act for anyone under the age of 18.”^[2]

9. What Parents Can Do Right Now

CCHR Florida urges Florida parents to take the following protective steps:

Know your rights: Under Florida law, parents have the right to direct their child’s mental health care.
Submit a Non-Consent Form to your child’s school: This document informs school officials that the Baker Act is a last resort, not a disciplinary tool.
Demand informed consent: Any psychiatric evaluation or treatment must involve parental approval.
Question mental health screenings: Ask what screenings your child is being exposed to at school and what data is being collected.
Contact CCHR Florida if your child has been wrongly Baker Acted: 1-800-782-2878 (Baker Act Abuse Hotline, available 24/7).^[1]

Conclusion

The pattern documented across CCHR Florida’s extensive body of work is consistent and alarming: Florida’s children are being subjected to involuntary psychiatric detentions, unproven diagnoses, dangerous drug prescriptions, and shock treatments; often without parental knowledge or consent, and primarily in service of the financial interests of the psychiatric and pharmaceutical industries.

The good news is that when parents are empowered, when the law requires their involvement and respects their authority, outcomes for children improve. Youth suicide rates decline. Baker Act numbers drop. The data is clear.

The path forward requires continued legislative action, public awareness, and the unwavering principle that parents, not the state and not psychiatric institutions, are the primary protectors of their children’s safety, health, and well-being.

SOURCES: